Nikolai, Ivan prepared this Deal Case to help you align your team
This decision room keeps the context from your conversation with Ivan intact: the growth opportunity, the delivery-capacity concern, the Hamburg rollout path, and the internal alignment points your team needs before moving forward.
Deal snapshot
What the team needs to evaluate after watching the Deal Case.
The team needs a controlled outbound model, not a volume-first push.
A narrow market path makes execution easier to control and measure.
The delivery owner confirmed the concern is addressed; the team can now align on execution parameters.
Internal stakeholder discussion
Stakeholders discuss the opportunity, raise concerns, and work toward alignment.
My concern is delivery capacity. If outbound starts generating too many parallel projects, we could create operational strain quickly.
That’s fair. The goal isn’t aggressive growth. We need a structure that makes growth predictable.
I agree. A narrow Hamburg rollout feels much more realistic than trying to scale broadly too early.
Need Ivan's input?
Lars raised a delivery-capacity concern that could slow alignment. Invite Ivan to clarify the rollout constraints.
Thanks for raising this. The objective isn’t to maximize outbound volume. The model is built around delivery capacity first: narrow ICP, controlled outreach cadence, and clear capacity thresholds. The Hamburg rollout is designed to validate the model before expanding further.
That helps. If rollout volume stays tied to delivery capacity and we start with a narrow Hamburg scope, I don’t see a delivery risk. I’m comfortable moving forward with the ICP and cadence discussion.
Great. Let’s move into ICP validation and rollout planning.